|
Networking
- Editorial Issue 2 Vol.5
|
|
Editorial
Issue 2 Vol. 5 |
There
is much confusion about the purpose of Catholic schools. Depending on
where one stands within the Catholic community or even outside it, the
praise and criticism of Catholic schools flows. It
is always true, certainly to those struggling in schools, that expectations
of society towards schools provide an impossible agenda. It appears
that each initiative, whether it be related to economic performance,
social change, sports capability or eating habits, requires a starting
point within school. The Catholic school faces all these together with
the additional comments related to knowledge of catechism, Church attendance,
social and sexual habits, even good manners and courtesy. If these comments
build up a sense of paranoia it is hardly surprising. There
is also a deep paradox within the confusion of purpose, illustrated
by annual publication of examination results in league table forms.
While on the one-hand we deride these tables as being contrary to the
inherent purpose of schools, we are happy to claim the outcomes as proof
of the effectiveness of Catholic schools. If there is a stand taken
against their publication, it is seen as hypocritical or a cover-up,
rather than a principled stand. How do we proclaim the outcomes of the
other areas of purpose that we claim, what standards do we apply to
the judgement and how do we respond when things go badly and illegally
wrong? Are we in danger of quietly absorbing the modern market forces
that can compromise the Christian belief and purpose of Catholic schools
that we acclaim? Without doubt we face a very different world
from that in which many Catholic schools were first established. Questions
such as ‘who are schools for?’ ‘what
is their principal purpose?’ and ‘how do we teach Religious Education?’
will demand very different responses in the twenty-first century than
would have been envisaged in the nineteenth. This does not help with
the sense of confusion but does require a clear-headed view of the reality
of the present and the potential of the future.
Importantly there is also a very clear guide from scripture and
the traditions of the Church to be maintained. In
this sense, the document ‘Consecrated Persons and their Mission in Schools’
from the Vatican Congregation for Catholic Education is a helpful reminder
of purpose. Many of us in the United Kingdom might well say that this
document is coming too late. The visible presence of Religious in schools
in the United Kingdom has been diminishing over the years, almost to
a point of non-existence. But we must remember the Universal Church
and the continuing involvement of Religious in many countries as well
as the leadership roles undertaken by many religious in many forms.
However to see the document only in terms of Religious is a mistake
as John Lydon points out in his review in this issue. He proposes the
relevance to teaching as a vocation, the transmission of Religious charism
and styles of interaction within Catholic educational communities. There
is a full agenda here for all involved in Catholic schools. In
his well-received address to the CATSC Conference, Bishop Noble posed
many significant questions to the educators present in the course of
the Damian Lundy lecture. He began with an acceptance of the reality
of the school and Church community. ‘Our schools are full of sacramentalised
youngsters’ he said ‘but we would be rash to see that as an indication
of faith commitment.’ But he particularly called for an examination
of our own attitudes and expectations. The concept of ‘institutionalised
attitudes’ needs to be addressed within the Church and Church school
community in our mind-set for example towards practice and non-practice.
‘Have gospel values entered fully into ourselves?’ he posed. Speaking of ground clearing and offering perspectives
conducive to the faith he stressed the responsibility of the teaching
opportunities as well as the importance of the Christian ethos of the
school. The address, printed
in full in this edition of Networking, should be required reading and
in-house discussion in Catholic schools that wish to explore their role,
purpose and method. The
role of this journal is to foster co-operation, share good practice
and celebrate achievement. In what we report in individual schools as
well as in coming together in such events as the CHAS Conference on
inclusion, the EducareM initiative, the CAFOD report, indicate much
of which we should be proud within the Catholic schools of the United
Kingdom as a small part of the quarter-million Catholic schools world
wide. Those world-wide links are constantly expanding as we show in
our new initiative in company with our French counterparts. Such initiatives,
which are intended to provide opportunities for individual schools,
are not window-dressing but should be seen as a part of a wider mission.
‘By co-ordinating with other educational agencies and in a more extensive
communications network, a school stimulates the process of personal,
professional and social growth of its own students’ we are told in that
‘Mission in Schools’ document. Returning
to the question ‘what is the purpose of Catholic schools?’ we can begin
to discern a new clarity of an old identity. Catholic schools are a
clear part of the evangelising role of the Church. They are to make
the individual ‘fully alive’ to the power of the gospel message. They
do it through the formal structures as the search for excellence is
pursued but they do it also through the network of relationships within
the community. They do it by living the gospel message and by taking
advantage of those 'perspectives conducive to faith. The
close of the document from the Vatican speaks of ‘starting afresh from
Christ.’ It is explained that this means ‘contemplating his face, pausing
at length with him in prayer to then be able to show him to others.’
It goes on ‘the task of teaching to live, discovering the deepest meaning
of life and of transcendence, to mutually interact with others, to love
creation, to think freely and critically, to find fulfilment in work,
to plan the future, in one word to be, demands a new love of consecrated
persons for educational and cultural commitment in schools.’ That demand
is shared with all working in Catholic schools. |